Speaking of the
Nkandla squabble, how about we put ourselves in the shoes of our president? No,
read further.
To the Gautengers,
do you remember those days when you used to drive through those narrow Joburg
highways which slowed you down? How you used to be inconvenienced by the
barricades? Do you remember how you obliged by the rules, despite the fact that
you were getting late for your appointments? Many people got fired for arriving
late for work. And my heart goes out to them.
Do you remember how
many meetings you missed because you were late? Hey, at some point, Midrand was
a nightmare, especially during peak times. You’d bake inside your car, or taxi,
if you found yourself crawling around there. But now we are boasting up to 6/7
lanes. Driving past Allandale offramp is like flying. Keep that benefit which you
are enjoying in mind for a second... And come with me.
Don’t you think that
our president must have gone through similar episodes of inconvenience? He has
sacrificed a lot, people! Imagine our president arriving home one ordinary
afternoon and... alas, his home is a mess. That thatch roof has been removed;
that wall has been demolished; that fence has been pulled down; the kandakanda is digging in what is
supposedly youngest wife’s hut. He looks around. Some neighbour’s house has
been flattened. Nobody is telling him what happened. He must not dare ask.
Asking is tantamount to security breach.
Serious-looking
people are busy around the yard. They are not vetted. Nobody is. There are
barricades to the hut of MmaKhumalo. The MmaNtuli hut is completely cordoned
off. To get there, president has to walk round the fence to the opposite end,
which means passing by the hut which he is not scheduled to be in this time
around. Damnit! By that time, his chiskop is baking like your entire self would
be near Allandale offramp.
He will not be
driven in that rough, sleek, but dirty Navara belonging to Mr. Makhanya. Doing
so will compromise his security. Makhanya is not vetted either. And who cares?
The president spends an hour inside a spaza shop (it is still intact, for now).
The shop-keeper gives president a glass of Oros. It’s all she can afford. It is
not security breach. He has been instructed to wait for Project Manager
(Makhanya) to fetch him using a strategically safer path.
To kill time, he strolls
around with his young children. They’d been playing on a fresh mound of sand. 'Baba,
ba yenzani labantu la ekhaya?' asks a curious of them. 'Heeheeheehee,' laughs
the president. He finds himself walking on a freshly dug patch. Some labourer,
unbeknown to president, in blue overalls, points out to him in a deep Zulu 'We
are building you a soccer pitch here, Mr president.' (translated). 'And we are
building you a fire pool over there.' he concludes. ‘Heh madoda!’ exclaims the
president.
Mr Makhanya arrives.
He has sketched out a rather "ballooned" short-cut to president’s
scheduled destination.
Let’s leave the
president to enjoy his treasure. We are simply judging him because we are not
the ones whose security has been “upgraded.” We are forgetting that it is our
highways which have been upgraded. How hypocritical of us! The president says
he did not ask for the upgrades. Judging by the concocted evidence, or lack
thereof, the president is telling the truth.
The other truth is that I am enjoying the
broader, faster and nicer Gauteng highways. And the good news for government is
that I am not going to pay for the e-tolls! I did not ask for them.
Fusi Motaung, have you noticed that Zuma is 1 person who got R248 000 000 spent on him personally? Gauteng Highway users are up to 12 000 000 people. If we spent R248 000 000 on each one of them, it will be R2 976 000 000 000 000 that is 3000 times more than the total gross annual budget of the South African Government. Some Hollywood actors don't even live in homes as much as Nkandla, and yet their annual income is more the Pres Zuma's. Has it occur to you that it is part of the Government's purpose of appointment to provide roads for us to drive on? That some South Africans pay up to 60% of their salaries in taxes - which is by our constitution designated to provide public services including roads? It is not a luxury to drive on a road, it is an requirement for the national economy! Having a swimming pool and an amphitheater for personal use is not a requirement for an economy to function. The highways are for the people - the purpose of the appointed government, not for one single man - the purpose of a corrupt official. Johannesburg and Pretoria has the largest portion of South Africa's economy (46%), but only make up 14% of the working population. The billions of taxes generated by the Gauteng business (import tax, export tax, VAT, income tax, LBS, fuel levies) etc. are designated to pay for our highways, which at some spots deserve even 9 lanes! Gauteng maintained all its highways for over 100 years without fuel levies and e-tolls. What suddenly changed in 2009? I think you need to get to know and understand the purpose of an administration, and you really need to open your eyes and realize when something makes sense, and is sensible, and when it starts to get ridiculous, corrupt and out of hand. It is not difficult to see the signs. By the way, if you really know how the highways were 20 years ago, you will know, that the traffic situation was at times better, there were much less people who had to travel the road, and more specifically much less bus' and trucks (as we still had a functioning railway system). The President has full knowledge of things that go on in the Government. He needs to posses the knowledge and intelligence to know what is going on. There is no excuse for that. If he was mislead, then after 4 years of the investigations of the Nkandla case and numorous warnings, he should have pointed this out by now, and showed us that he did take swift action. Any other president would have done that... Can the CEO of a company just sign off on millions and say at the end of his shift he didn't know about it or asked for it? Don't insult your own intelligence please, I'm sure you can think a little further than this...
ReplyDeleteHi Frans
DeleteThank you for engaging me on this piece. You have certainly elaborated your argument. I agree with you. 100%.
I suspect that you missed the sarcasm with which I used to wrap up the piece. Please read it again, if you can.